Crotalus horridus - timber/canebrake rattlesnake
Crotalus horridus from Frederick Co., Maryland
The intraspecific taxonomy of the timber rattlesnake has been a subject of considerable controversy, in particular the question of whether the often larger, differently patterned populations from the souther half of the range should be recognised as a separate subspecies, C.h. atricaudatus. Clark et al. (2003) analysed the phylogeography of Crotalus horridus across the eastern United States. Levels of mitochondrial DNA variation in the sampled region (319 b.p.) were small (average pairwise divergence 1.1%), and did not correspond to the conventionally accepted subspecies C. h. horridus and C. h. atricaudatus. Three major mtDNA gene lineages were identified: one is largely restricted to the Atlantic coastal plain from Vermont to Florida, but crosses the Appalachians in western VA, WV and NC; a second is found in most of the range of C. horridus, except the Atlantic coastal plain north of South Carolina; a third is restricted to Missouri. An analysis of molecular variance revealed very low support for the conventional two-subspecies arrangement (which explains only 3.5% of the variance present), whereas an alternative geographic classification dividing the range into southern, northern and western region explained 18.6% of genetic variation. The observed pattern of higher genetic diversity in southern populations, compared to northern ones, is interpreted as a result of northward expansion following Pleistocene glaciations. The morphological similarities between northwestern and northeastern populations may have evolved independently, in parallel, whereas the "canebrake" phenotype of southern populations may represent the ancestral condition. In view of the absence of reciprocal monophyly between the regional groupings, the authors of this study recommend against the recognition of subspecies, and consider C. horridus a single, monotypic species, while acknowledging the existence of population structure and extensive geographic variation within it.
Atropoides
- Jumping vipers
Atropoides
nummifer
Castoe et al. (2003) used phylogenetic
analysis of two mitochondrial gene sequences to reconstruct the phylogeny
of the genus Atropoides. The monophyly of the genus was neither supported
nor contradicted by their data. Atropoides nummifer was found to
be genetically diverse (up to 10.1% pairwise divergence), and A. olmec
was found to rooted among the A. nummifer haplotypes. Moreover, A.
olmec haplotypes were recovered not just from the type locality of that
species in Veracruz, but also from NE. Oaxaca, Mexico, and Baja Verapaz,
Guatemala, suggesting that the species may have a wider distribution than
previously anticipated. The various subspecies of A. nummifer probably
deserve speciesstatus. However, the authors note that species limit should
not be inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence data alone, and therefore
refrain from making any formal changes.
Tillack et al. studied the available
material of green Trimeresurus from Central Nepal and southern Tibet.
Morphological characters indicate that the variation of T. karanshahi,
described by Orlov & Helfenberger, lies within the range of variation
for T. tibetanus Huang, 1982. This is confirmed by low levels of mtDNA
sequence divergence between populations from different localities. Consequently,
the authors consider T. karanshahi to be conspecific with, and a
junior synonym of, T. tibetanus.
Porthidium
porrasi - White-tailed hognosed pitviper
Lamar & Sasa (2003) described
a new species of hognosed pitviper, Porthidium porrasi, from the Peninsula
de Osa and themainland on the oppsite side of the Golfo Dulce, on the Pacific
coast of Costa Rica. The population was previously regarded as a differentiated
population of Porthidium nasutum. It differs from P. nasutum
in retianing a white tail tip into adulthood, in having 25-27 rather than
23 dorsal scale rows at midbody, and in having a more banded pattern compared
to the blotched pattern of P. nasutum. Mitochondrial DNA sequence
analysis confiemd the divergecne between the new species and P. nasutum,
and its status as the sister species of the latter.